Answer:
victims or their family members
Explanation:
Ano ang kahulugan ng talos-tanod
Answer:
Here is the answer..
TALOS-TANOD
Bongani is 19 years old and lives with his parents. Without his guardian's consent, he concludes a contract of sale to sell his motorcycle for R2 000 to Mxali who is 25 years old. On enquiry by Mxali, Bongani lies about his age and says that he is 21 years old. Mxali pays the R2 000, but Bongani refuses to deliver the motorcycle to Mxali. Did Bongani breach any contract?
Answer: He did not breach any contract with Mxali
Explanation: Brainliest
What is the term for the type of company that provides coverage for an individual's risks?
Since the start of the 1970s, how has the supreme court ruled regarding the commerce clause of the constitution?.
In 1970 supreme court limit congress' ability to use commerce clause to address national issues
The U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause is included in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3. Congress has the authority under the Constitution to "control trade with foreign countries, among the various states, and with Indian tribes. The Commerce Clause has been frequently invoked by Congress as justification for exerting legislative control over the actions of states and their residents, sparking intense and ongoing debate about the distribution of power between the states and the federal government. The Commerce Clause has historically been seen as both a gift of power to Congress and a limitation on the power of the States to regulate themselves. The Trade Clause forbids states from enacting laws that discriminate against or unduly impede interstate commerce, and this is known as the "Dormant Commerce Clause."
To know more about Commerce Clause refer to https://brainly.com/question/846709
#SPJ4
Jack Jones, a 65-year-old with a heart condition, was driving alone in his Toyota Camry south on College Ave. in Fayetteville on September 15, 2009, his seat belt buckled, the driver-side window open and his left elbow outside it. Suddenly the accelerator jammed and the car leapt forward. Jack stomped the brake pedal but the Camry kept speeding up, running stoplights and skidding wildly on the downhill curves. Finally the car flipped, rolled over twice, and came to rest in the parking lot of Penguin Ed’s. The side airbags had deployed, and Jack’s left elbow formed an odd angle. Jack’s troubles had only begun. After he arrived by ambulance at Washington Regional Hospital, Dr. Davis was setting his broken elbow when Jack went into cardiac arrest. Luckily the medical response time was quick, his condition was stabilized and a Medtronic heart pacemaker was implanted in his chest to avoid future cardiac episodes. Unluckily, a wire component connecting the pacemaker to the heart failed on Nov. 1, 2009. Jack had another heart attack Nov. 2, and he is not likely to live. Jack’s wife Jan read in the newspaper about Toyota’s September 28, 2009 recall of 3.8 million vehicles, including the 2008 Camry, due to reports of driver- side floor mat entrapment of accelerator pedals. She consulted a partner in the Fayetteville law firm at which you are employed. The partner had a paralegal gather a few facts, noted below, and has turned the file over to you for preliminary analysis. The partner has instructed you to write a memo explaining the following: 1. What claims might the Joneses have, against whom, on what basis, and for what injuries? What authorities support each claim? 2. If you think that a particular claim may not succeed, explain why not. 3. If you lack sufficient information to evaluate a claimfully, describe what other information you need, how it would affect your evaluation of that cause of action, and how to obtain it. 4. Bottom line: Should we take this case? Why or why not? Or is it too soon to tell?
Answer:
1 Toyota 2 no 3 cameras 4 yes
Explanation:
